Probably not yet, and that is normal. Across 218 first-draft personal statements scored this UCAS cycle, the average was 61 out of 100 and the median was 64. Only 17% reached the 77 to 86 band typical of a competitive Russell Group application, and none reached the 87-plus band associated with Oxbridge offers. A first draft scoring in the 60s is on track, not failing.
If you have just finished a first draft and you are wondering whether it is any good, here is a straight answer built from real data rather than opinion.
We scored 218 first-draft UCAS personal statements this cycle, all submitted for a free check since the 2027 cycle opened in May 2026. Every one was marked against the same rubric, out of 100.
The average was 61.5. The median was 64.
Is your personal statement strong enough?
Get a score out of 100, line-by-line feedback, before & after rewrites, and a 10-step improvement plan — in under 10 minutes.
Review my statement → From £7.49 · Results in under 10 minIf your draft feels like it is not there yet, you are in the majority, and you are roughly where everyone else is.
What 218 first drafts actually looked like
| Score band | Share of drafts | What it usually means |
|---|---|---|
| Under 40 | 11% | Substantial rewrite needed |
| 40 to 59 | 25% | Recognisable first draft |
| 60 to 76 | 47% | On track, not competitive yet |
| 77 to 86 | 17% | Competitive Russell Group range |
| 87 and above | 0% | Oxbridge range |
Two things stand out.
Nearly half of all first drafts land between 60 and 76. That is the crowded middle: the statement reads fine, the grammar is clean, nothing is obviously wrong, and it still would not stand out in a pile of two hundred.
Not one first draft in the sample reached 87. Statements do reach that band, but in our data they get there by revision, not by being written that way the first time. The highest first draft we scored this cycle was 81.
Get a free personal statement preview in September
Most applicants leave their statement until January and rush it. Leave your email and we’ll send you one reminder when the writing season opens, with a free preview of your statement — score, strengths, and what to fix.
One email in September. Unsubscribe any time — we never share your address.
The three things that separate a 61 from a 77
When we compared the drafts scoring under 60 with those scoring 70 and above, three issues came up far more often in the weaker group. These are not impressions. They are the problems the scoring engine flagged, counted across both groups.
1. Work experience described instead of reflected on
Flagged in 46% of drafts under 60, against 15% of drafts scoring 70 or more. It is the single biggest separator in the data.
The pattern is almost always the same. The applicant says where they went, how long they were there, and what they saw. What is missing is what any of it changed.
"I spent two weeks shadowing at a GP surgery, where I observed consultations and learned about the role of a doctor."
That sentence could belong to any of ten thousand applicants. Compare:
"Watching a GP spend eleven minutes talking a patient out of antibiotics she had already decided she needed, I realised persuasion is a clinical skill, not a soft one."
Same placement. The second one could only have been written by the person who was in the room.
2. Skills claimed without evidence
Flagged in 45% of drafts under 60, against 22% of the stronger group.
Phrases like "strong communication skills", "excellent time management" and "I am highly motivated" are assertions. An admissions tutor has no reason to believe them, and every applicant writes them, so they carry no information at all.
The fix is mechanical: delete the claim and describe the thing that would make someone conclude it on their own.
3. Writing in general terms where a specific one would do more
Flagged as vague in 59% of drafts under 60, against 36% above 70.
Generality is the default setting of a first draft, because the writer knows what they mean. The reader does not. "I have always been interested in economics" tells a tutor nothing; naming the argument in the book that changed your mind tells them what kind of economist you might become.
What this means for your draft
If you are scoring in the 60s, nothing is broken. You are in the band where roughly half of all applicants start, and the distance to a competitive statement is usually not writing quality.
It is almost always evidence. The applicants who score 77 and above are not better writers. They are more specific.
The practical version:
- Take every sentence about work experience and ask what it changed in your thinking. If the answer is nothing, it is taking up characters it has not earned.
- Find every claim about yourself and delete it. Replace it with the thing that proves it, or cut it entirely.
- Find the three vaguest sentences in your statement. Make each one name something: a book, a case, a number, a moment.
A first draft at 61 is not a bad personal statement. It is an unfinished one.
A note on the numbers
These 218 statements are the drafts people chose to have checked, so they are not a random sample of every UCAS applicant. People who seek out feedback are probably already more engaged than average, which if anything means the true picture across all applicants is not better than this one.
Scores come from a single consistent rubric applied to every statement. They are a calibrated estimate, not an admissions decision. No university scores personal statements out of 100.
Find out where yours sits
You can have your own statement scored against the same rubric these 218 were marked with, free, in a few minutes. You will get your band, the biggest weaknesses in your opening section, and a sense of how far you are from competitive.
It reviews what you wrote. It never writes it for you.
Frequently asked questions
What is a good score for a UCAS personal statement?
As a rough guide, first drafts typically land between 40 and 60, a competitive Russell Group application sits around 77 to 86, and Oxbridge-level statements score 87 and above. In our sample of 218 first drafts this cycle, the average was 61, which means most people start just above the first-draft band and have real distance still to cover.
Is my personal statement good enough if it scores 65?
It is a normal starting point. 65 sits in the band where most first drafts land, above the weakest quarter but below the 77 mark where applications start to look competitive for selective courses. The gap between 65 and 77 is usually evidence and reflection rather than writing quality.
Why do most first drafts score in the 60s?
The most common reasons in our data are describing work experience rather than reflecting on it, claiming skills without evidence, and writing in general terms where a specific example would do more work. These three patterns show up far more often in drafts scoring under 60 than in drafts scoring 70 or above.
How many drafts does a personal statement usually need?
There is no fixed number, but the jump from a first draft to a competitive statement is normally a rewrite rather than an edit. Most of the distance comes from replacing general claims with specific evidence, which usually means restructuring paragraphs rather than tidying sentences.
Get your personal statement reviewed by AI — score, annotations, rewrites, and a 10-step plan in under 10 minutes.