Free tool · no account needed
Paste your UCAS personal statement. We point to the phrases that read as AI-typical and what to do about them.
It checks for AI-like writing style, not whether AI was actually used.
Generic openers and overused phrases ("I have always been passionate about...")
Vague enthusiasm without specific evidence or personal detail
Grand sweeping conclusions that lack authenticity
AI-typical sentence patterns and hedging language
This tool analyses writing style only. It cannot confirm whether AI was used to write your statement. Many students who did not use AI still have AI-typical patterns — and that is exactly the problem it helps you fix.
There are two separate checks, and most advice online mixes them up. UCAS runs Copycatch, a similarity check that compares your statement with ones already submitted and with samples published online. It catches copying, not AI. How Copycatch works.
The AI checking happens at universities. Some run statements through detection tools, and every admissions tutor reads hundreds of statements a cycle, so generic machine-sounding prose stands out without any software. At interview, tutors ask about what you wrote. More in do universities check for AI?
AI models learned from the same safe phrasing applicants have used for years, so the habits overlap. The patterns that read as AI:
Want the full picture? The UCAS personal statement checker scores your statement out of 100, marks every line, rewrites the weak ones and adds a score from a dedicated AI-detection model. See also my personal statement sounds like AI.
UCAS runs Copycatch, a similarity check that compares your statement with statements already submitted and with samples published online. It is not an AI detector. The AI checking happens at universities, which can use their own detection tools, and at admissions tutors, who read hundreds of statements and recognise generic machine-sounding prose by eye.
Because AI models learned to write from the same safe, polished phrasing that applicants have used for years. Openers like "I have always been passionate about", lists of three abstract qualities, and conclusions about "contributing to the academic community" read as AI whoever wrote them. Grammar tools and paraphrasers make it worse by smoothing out your own voice.
No. This free tool checks writing style: it flags the phrases and patterns that make a statement read as AI-written and suggests what to change. It cannot prove whether AI was used. The full Statementory report adds a score from a dedicated AI-detection model alongside line-by-line feedback and rewrites.
Using AI to write your statement breaches UCAS rules. Using a tool to check, score or give feedback on a statement you wrote yourself is a different thing: the words stay yours, and you decide what to change.